I will be pleased to see eHarmony reacting within their formal weblog to a write-up named “Marriage-Maker states Are Tied in Knots ” through the Wall Street log. The WSJ post examines a few of the wedding data revealed by online anonymous dating sites like eHarmony along with the strategy used to determine this type of data. We chatted slightly about this topic at the same time, a few weeks ago if the original WSJ article was actually published (see Story).
The WSJ post failed to check out kindly regarding stats revealed by online dating sites, and for the many part I agree with the writer. Anyone ought to know exactly how these research tend to be produced. Of all dating sites discussed within the WSJ post, “eHarmony sticks out as among the list of much more cautious types”. It is not precisely a glowing report for eHarmony very, they decided to publish a response on the weblog.
Within the eHarmony blog post they go into more information on the way they calculated that their dating internet site was responsible for 2per cent of marriages in america, from the 12-month duration finishing March 2007. A lot of the info we already realized about from a previously circulated PDF file named “eHarmony | Harris Interactive 2007 Marriage Metrics few eHarmony Marriages” (see Story), but the blog post does cleanse a few more details. Just what this web site blog post does tv show is, eHarmony is wanting to get as available and clear and their research conclusions as is possible. In my opinion title “start correspondence” may indeed be your best option your formal eHarmony blog site.
Right here is the full eHarmony response to the Wall Street diary about how exactly they assess their unique matrimony stats. For additional information on this dating site, study our very own report on eHarmony.